Sakana trains 1000-layer networks with no backpropagation

Share
Sakana trains 1000-layer networks with no backpropagation

A paper out of Sakana AI this week takes the oldest objection to local learning and answers it where it bites hardest — depth. Meanwhile the slowdown debate got its most concrete moment yet, on speakerphone.


Sakana AI's PC-ALM is the first layer-local training method shown to work on networks up to 1000 layers deep, according to work published by the lab and posted to arXiv. Predictive coding has long been the credible alternative to backpropagation: each layer nudges its own activity to shrink the prediction error with its neighbours, supervision enters at the output, and the correction creeps backwards through a chain of local compromises. The failure mode is signal decay — in deep, narrow networks the credit signal goes weak long before it reaches the input, which is exactly the regime where backprop earns its keep. PC-ALM's fix is to run primal-dual inference on an augmented Lagrangian instead of gradient flow on an energy. Lagrange multipliers accumulate the local prediction errors, and the authors derive a result that does the work: in a deep linear network those accumulated dual variables recover the exact backprop credit signal, using only communication between adjacent layers. On the benchmark grid from recent predictive-coding scaling work — MLPs at matched width, depth, inference budget and seed, trained for a single epoch on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST — standard predictive coding tracks backprop in wide shallow nets and falls behind as nets get deeper and narrower, while PC-ALM holds close to backprop across the whole grid for all three activations tested, with the largest gains exactly where predictive coding fails and no extra inference cost. It also beat predictive coding on every task tried, including ResNet-18 on CIFAR-10 and Tiny Image Net, and individual neurons settle into damped oscillations during inference. The honest caveat is the task list: these are small vision benchmarks, not language models, and the stated motivation is neuroscience — how a physical system assigns credit for a global objective. Nothing here threatens backprop at frontier scale today. What it does threaten is the assumption that a layer-local rule must be worse at depth, and that is the kind of result that changes what people try next.


President Trump telephoned Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang mid-session at the All-in Summit in Los Angeles on Monday, put the call on speaker, and told the room the backlash to AI and data centers is "all a hoax." Huang asked stagehands for an extra microphone rather than hanging up, and the two spent the exchange agreeing: data centers are "the oil of the next 20, 25 years," opposition to building them is "playing right into the hands" of people who want it stopped, which Trump said could be political opponents or China. "We're not going to let that happen," Trump said. "You're right. We're not going to let that happen, sir," Huang replied, to applause. Trump also joked that Huang can design a chip nobody can copy but cannot work a speakerphone, and that he had "not even known how [Huang] felt about it." Chamath Palihapitiya's post-session verdict was "surreal." The substance behind the spectacle: the summit call came hours after Trump's all-caps post declaring that the only guardrails AI needs are already in his hands, and it puts the world's most valuable company's chief executive publicly on the anti-pacing side of a fight Anthropic started and OpenAI half-joined. This is the enforcement posture we looked at earlier today — Trump's answer to the pacing ask: he already has criminal power over the labs — now with a handshake attached, and an Nvidia representative that did not respond to a request for comment.

What to watch: whether PC-ALM survives a contact with a language model at scale — the reproduction is public, so that test is a GPU allocation away.

Local learning rules have lost to backprop on paper for forty years — is one epoch on MNIST enough to make you rethink your training stack? Tell us in the comments.

Sources: SakanaAI/pc-alm (GitHub)

Read more

AI 101 — How do AI video generators work?

AI 101 — How do AI video generators work?

An AI video generator is a model that starts with a grid of random noise and repeatedly refines it into a moving picture that matches your prompt — the same trick image generators use, stretched across time. Nothing is filmed, and nothing is stitched together from clips the model has seen. The pixels in the finished video were invented, frame by frame, all at once. Why it matters right now Kling 4.0, Kuaishou's flagship video model, went fully live on October 15 with up to 30 seconds of vid

Houmo moves compute inside memory — and A20 enters production

Houmo moves compute inside memory — and A20 enters production

Beijing chipmaker Houmo used its partner conference this week to lay out two compute-in-memory routes at once — and to say the first chip built on the newer one is already in production. Houmo's A20, its first chip built on a 3D compute-in-memory architecture, has entered production. The part supports up to 16 chips fully interconnected, claims a 50% improvement in compute utilization over the previous generation, and covers models from 3B to 30B parameters, according to co-founder and product

Kling 4.0 goes live with 30-second native video at 10-bit HDR

Kling 4.0 goes live with 30-second native video at 10-bit HDR

Kuaishou's Kling AI has spent two years becoming the video model people actually finish projects with. Its new flagship, Kling 4.0, went fully live on October 15 — and this round is less about prettier frames than about the two things that make a generated shot usable in a real edit: length and control. Kling 4.0 generates up to 30 seconds in a single native pass, outputs 10-bit HDR at 4K, 1080p and 21:9, and takes up to 15 reference assets in one task. That budget splits across ten images, fi

Brain organoids classified Braille at 83% — in a trio, not alone

Brain organoids classified Braille at 83% — in a trio, not alone

Two stories today: human brain tissue on a chip decoded a tactile signal, and the data-centre company behind some of the largest AI contracts in Europe turns out to be six months behind on its flagship site. Human forebrain organoids grown on a microelectrode array classified Braille letters with 61 percent accuracy on their own and 83 percent when the responses of three organoids were combined, in a peer-reviewed study from the University of Bristol. The team took event-based tactile readings