Two unannounced Claude models just surfaced in Anthropic's API — and one may already beat Opus 5

Share
Two unannounced Claude models just surfaced in Anthropic's API — and one may already beat Opus 5

Anthropic's next lineup has leaked the old-fashioned way: developers spotted two never-announced models, claude-marshmallow-eap and claude-melon-eap, sitting in the company's API. Multiple developers confirmed both codenames through API access and Discord, and early testers report that Marshmallow's conversational performance already edges out Opus 5 — Anthropic's current flagship, released barely a month ago. Neither model carries a Fable-class designation, so community consensus points to them as the next rungs on the Opus and Sonnet ladders — with TheWinCentral speculating "Marshmallow" is an early Claude Opus 5.1 and "Melon" a Claude Sonnet 5.1.

The "-eap" suffix marks both as Early Access Program builds: internal test stages opened to only a small circle of developers. That framing matters, because codenames that appear in a public API are neither final nor committed — they can be renamed, merged, or cancelled entirely. But the circumstantial evidence for an imminent refresh is strong. Opus 5 shipped July 24 and Sonnet 5 on June 30; a new pair entering EAP barely a month later would push Anthropic's iteration cadence to roughly a major update every two weeks this year. Even the internal naming scheme has shifted — previous leaks used animal codenames like "Fennec" for Sonnet 5.5, while this pair switches to foods, which some read as a sign the models belong to a fresh development branch.

The timing lands at a delicate moment. Rivals are cutting prices to court cost-sensitive enterprise buyers, Anthropic's IPO paperwork is reportedly weeks away, and its own users have been grumbling about silent quality changes — a controversy over Claude Code quietly remapping "high" reasoning effort blew up just yesterday. Leaking your next-generation models into the wild is usually an accident; leaking them this loudly, right before a public listing, looks almost like a rehearsal.

What would it take for you to switch from your current Claude tier — a smarter Marshmallow, or a cheaper Melon? Tell us in the comments.

Read more

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Light-based computing keeps promising more than it delivers — but one Munich startup has just put a date on its bet, and the interview laying it out is doing the rounds on Hacker News this week. Akhetonics says it will deploy its first commercial machine with a major customer by the end of 2026, with several more planned for 2027. The company, founded by Michael Kissner and Leonardo Del Bino, is building a computer where data enters as light, is switched as light, and circulates through memory

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

Every big claim this week turned out to rest on fine print more interesting than the headline: revenue only the company reporting it can define, safety tests sandboxed while the product keeps the web, and a Pentagon phase-out nobody would confirm until reporters kept asking. The week's top 5 1. OpenAI's revenue was $20 billion below the numbers everyone quoted — and the gap was definitional. The Financial Times reported Thursday that OpenAI's annualized revenue runs roughly $20 billion unde

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Russia's largest tech company is learning what the AI era's infrastructure war looks like from the receiving end — three data centers in four days, and with them much of the cloud layer Russian businesses run on. A Ukrainian drone strike knocked out Yandex's data center in Vladimir early Sunday morning, the third of the company's facilities hit since October 8. The site — reported at roughly 50 MW and designed for about 2,880 server racks — stopped operating completely after the attack, Yandex

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

The multi-agent hype train hit a benchmark this weekend — and the grid and the trucking regulators had quiet weeks of their own. Vals AI put agent teams head-to-head with single agents on its Vibe Code Bench, and the teams cost between 1.8 and 5.1 times more for almost no extra quality. The evals company ran GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 solo and in teams across 50 apps at two reasoning efforts; out of four comparisons, only one was statistically significant — Sol at medium effort, where the t