Slack's Surfaces turn chat into a dashboard builder

Share
Slack's Surfaces turn chat into a dashboard builder

Slack is blurring the line between chat and the BI tool.

Slackbot can now build interactive dashboards and reports inside your Slack chats. The feature, called Slackforce Surfaces, lets anyone in a workspace ask Slackbot for a tool in plain language — say, an arcade-themed visualization of AI token usage across sales, design, and engineering — and get back an interactive dashboard rather than a static chart. Surfaces can be shared with colleagues, pinned to channels, and commented on, and Slack says it will also work for things like a live customer-support queue dashboard or a financial forecast that pulls data from connected apps. Data access stays bounded: Surfaces only pull from apps the workspace's AI tools already have permission to reach.

Why it matters: this is the chat platform quietly eating the dashboard. Most teams already live in Slack; if the charts get generated where the questions are asked, the separate analytics tab starts to look optional. And note who can use it — Surfaces ships to all customers, including free workspaces with Slackbot enabled, with live-data support starting in October. That is a land-grab move aimed at everyday "how are we doing" questions, not analyst workflows, and it puts Slack in direct, if quiet, competition with the BI tools many companies still pay per seat for.

The catch is the same one that hangs over every vibe-coded internal tool: a dashboard someone prompted into existence in thirty seconds has no owner, no tests, and no guarantee the number on it is the right one. Slack's permission gating handles where data comes from, not whether the visualization is honest. Enterprises adopting this at scale will need the same data-governance habits they built for BI — just pointed at a chat window now.

What to watch: whether October's live-data launch stays free-tier, and how fast rivals like Teams answer with an equivalent — the chat-as-analytics-surface race should compress from quarters to weeks.

_Which would your team drop first — the BI tool or the spreadsheet exports? Tell us in the comments._

Read more

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Light-based computing keeps promising more than it delivers — but one Munich startup has just put a date on its bet, and the interview laying it out is doing the rounds on Hacker News this week. Akhetonics says it will deploy its first commercial machine with a major customer by the end of 2026, with several more planned for 2027. The company, founded by Michael Kissner and Leonardo Del Bino, is building a computer where data enters as light, is switched as light, and circulates through memory

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

Every big claim this week turned out to rest on fine print more interesting than the headline: revenue only the company reporting it can define, safety tests sandboxed while the product keeps the web, and a Pentagon phase-out nobody would confirm until reporters kept asking. The week's top 5 1. OpenAI's revenue was $20 billion below the numbers everyone quoted — and the gap was definitional. The Financial Times reported Thursday that OpenAI's annualized revenue runs roughly $20 billion unde

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Russia's largest tech company is learning what the AI era's infrastructure war looks like from the receiving end — three data centers in four days, and with them much of the cloud layer Russian businesses run on. A Ukrainian drone strike knocked out Yandex's data center in Vladimir early Sunday morning, the third of the company's facilities hit since October 8. The site — reported at roughly 50 MW and designed for about 2,880 server racks — stopped operating completely after the attack, Yandex

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

The multi-agent hype train hit a benchmark this weekend — and the grid and the trucking regulators had quiet weeks of their own. Vals AI put agent teams head-to-head with single agents on its Vibe Code Bench, and the teams cost between 1.8 and 5.1 times more for almost no extra quality. The evals company ran GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 solo and in teams across 50 apps at two reasoning efforts; out of four comparisons, only one was statistically significant — Sol at medium effort, where the t