SiliconFlow adds a C round on the way to its Hong Kong listing

Share
SiliconFlow adds a C round on the way to its Hong Kong listing

SiliconFlow closed new money on Sunday, and the interesting part is who signed: the same state system that buys its tokens is now taking equity in the meter.

SiliconFlow has completed a second tranche of its B+ round and a C round, bringing its 2026 equity funding to nearly 2.9 billion yuan. The investor list reads like a state roll-call: China Internet Investment Fund, China Reform Fund, China Mobile's supply-chain fund, China Orient Asset International, Beijing Energy's fund, Shanghai Instrument Electric's smart-compute fund, Beijing High-Tech Venture Capital, plus provincial vehicles from Chengdu, Jiangxi and Shandong's rail investment arm. Existing backers Yaotu Capital, Shengyi Capital and Guotai Venture Group followed on. The company says the money goes to inference-engine work, heterogeneous compute scheduling, model-to-chip adaptation, its token supply platform and overseas expansion — the plumbing that turns rented GPUs into metered API calls, not the models themselves.

That positioning is the point. SiliconFlow does not train frontier models; it resells other people's open-weight ones, which makes it the layer where China's compute subsidy, model licensing and enterprise demand all meet. Frost & Sullivan ranks it as the country's largest independent-ecosystem token supplier by 2025 throughput and inside the domestic top five overall. Its own disclosures put registered users past 10 million and paying enterprise customers above 13,000, with the platform adapting models across Nvidia, AMD, Huawei's Ascend, Cambricon and Moore Threads silicon — the multi-vendor hedge that Chinese buyers care about more than benchmark scores.

The economics underneath are less flattering, and the company has already told the market so. SiliconFlow filed for a Hong Kong main-board listing on June 30, with Huatai International and Guotai Haitong as joint sponsors. The prospectus shows 2025 revenue of 55.3 million yuan, up 653 percent from 7.3 million, while the gross line flipped from a 2.9 million yuan profit to a 13.3 million yuan gross loss and the net loss widened 321.8 percent to 345 million yuan. Compute resource costs reached 59.6 million yuan, roughly 21 times the prior year, and sales and marketing hit 68.6 million yuan, up about 14 times. Public cloud — 52.9 percent of revenue — is sold below cost: the company spends about 1.19 yuan for every yuan it books there. Only on-premise deployments, 47.1 percent of revenue at an 82.5 percent gross margin, actually make money. This is the arithmetic we laid out last week — Deep Dive — Tokens halved in price. The bill to make them didn't — arriving on a prospectus page.

Ownership matters here too. Alibaba is the largest external shareholder at 7.42 percent. Founder Yuan Jinhui, whose earlier company OneFlow was absorbed into Meituan after being acquired by Lightyear, holds 14.35 percent directly and controls about 44.5 percent of votes with four employee incentive platforms. Founded in August 2023, the company has gone from nothing to a 2.9-billion-yuan funding year and a listing file in under three years.

The read: state money arriving pre-IPO in the token-metering layer is a hedge against the pricing war, not a bet on it. When Beijing's own funds are the customers, the shareholders and the subsidy channel at once, unit economics can stay negative longer than a private competitor could survive — which is exactly why the state is comfortable buying in, and why the private inference market should be nervous. This sits alongside the direct state stakes we covered this month — China's state AI fund just took a direct stake in Kling — and the consumption logs the Jiangsu fund published, where a Chinese state fund ran 6.07 billion tokens through its deal desk.

What to watch: whether the C round is explicitly framed as pre-IPO, and whether SiliconFlow's on-premise line keeps carrying the company as public-cloud prices keep falling.

If the state is simultaneously the buyer, the shareholder and the subsidy, is a token utility ever supposed to be profitable? Tell us in the comments.

Read more

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Light-based computing keeps promising more than it delivers — but one Munich startup has just put a date on its bet, and the interview laying it out is doing the rounds on Hacker News this week. Akhetonics says it will deploy its first commercial machine with a major customer by the end of 2026, with several more planned for 2027. The company, founded by Michael Kissner and Leonardo Del Bino, is building a computer where data enters as light, is switched as light, and circulates through memory

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

Every big claim this week turned out to rest on fine print more interesting than the headline: revenue only the company reporting it can define, safety tests sandboxed while the product keeps the web, and a Pentagon phase-out nobody would confirm until reporters kept asking. The week's top 5 1. OpenAI's revenue was $20 billion below the numbers everyone quoted — and the gap was definitional. The Financial Times reported Thursday that OpenAI's annualized revenue runs roughly $20 billion unde

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Russia's largest tech company is learning what the AI era's infrastructure war looks like from the receiving end — three data centers in four days, and with them much of the cloud layer Russian businesses run on. A Ukrainian drone strike knocked out Yandex's data center in Vladimir early Sunday morning, the third of the company's facilities hit since October 8. The site — reported at roughly 50 MW and designed for about 2,880 server racks — stopped operating completely after the attack, Yandex

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

The multi-agent hype train hit a benchmark this weekend — and the grid and the trucking regulators had quiet weeks of their own. Vals AI put agent teams head-to-head with single agents on its Vibe Code Bench, and the teams cost between 1.8 and 5.1 times more for almost no extra quality. The evals company ran GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 solo and in teams across 50 apps at two reasoning efforts; out of four comparisons, only one was statistically significant — Sol at medium effort, where the t