Jensen Huang resigns: Colette Kress is Nvidia's interim CEO
Nvidia's board announced Thursday that Jensen Huang has resigned as president, chief executive and a member of the board, effective immediately, the company said in a statement. Colette Kress, chief financial officer since 2013, becomes interim CEO and keeps the CFO job. Harvey C. Jones, the former Synopsys chief executive, was appointed the first chair of the board in Nvidia's 33-year history.
The statement carries two quotes: one from Jones, one from Kress. Neither is from Huang. There is no transition period, no advisory role, no chairman emeritus, and the thanks to the founder — "Jensen's contributions to NVIDIA are profound" — is written in the third person about a man who left the building the same morning. Boards do not phrase it that way when they expect the founder to stay involved.
The market read it as a removal. Shares fell about 12% in premarket trading and were roughly 6% lower shortly after the open, per Stock Analysis's quote. CoreWeave, the neocloud that leases Nvidia capacity and counts Nvidia as an investor, dropped 6% after hours on Wednesday, Reuters reported.
The chair is the real structural change
Nvidia had 11 directors and considered all but Huang independent, Reuters reported this week. It had no chair, because the CEO ran the board. He also had no president, no chief operating officer and around 60 direct reports — the flat structure we described when the board first opened its investigation.
Appointing Jones changes the shape of that. Jones ran Synopsys, which sells the design software every chip company on earth, Nvidia included, builds on. He is a semiconductor-toolchain operator, not an AI person, and he is now the board's chair rather than a figurehead the CEO appoints. That matters for one reason: it moves the succession decision out of the executive suite and into a room where the interim CEO has to report.
It also makes an outside hire more plausible. A board that wanted an internal caretaker would have given Kress the chair too, or named her permanent CEO on day one and ended the story. Instead the statement says the board "is initiating a search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer and will consider internal and external candidates" — language that keeps the job open for someone who has never worked at Nvidia.
Five days to an earnings call the CFO now answers alone
Nvidia reports third-quarter fiscal 2027 results on Tuesday, November 17, as previously scheduled. The company guided to $108 billion for the quarter, with an explicit assumption of no data-centre compute revenue from China in the number. Kress has spent thirteen years explaining that arithmetic to analysts; on Tuesday she explains it as the person in charge of the company that produced it.
The harder problem is what sits outside the income statement. Nvidia holds roughly $99 billion of stakes in AI companies, from frontier labs to neoclouds, The Verge reports, and it has committed to backstop part of a financing structure with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR aimed at mobilising more than $500 billion. Those agreements were negotiated by Huang personally, in most cases with the counterparty's CEO across the table.
An interim chief executive who is also the chief financial officer has one instinct, and it is the correct one: do not sign anything new that has to be marked to market before the auditors and the permanent CEO arrive. Watch for a quiet freeze on new strategic cheques. That is a bigger deal for the AI buildout than the chip roadmap, because Nvidia's investment book has become the down payment on other companies' capacity, and a pause at the centre of it lands on the customers who were counting on the next commitment.
The China argument lost its author
Huang's second job was salesman for a policy. He argued, publicly and repeatedly, that export controls cost American chipmakers market share and pushed China to build its own accelerators, and he took that case to President Trump in person. Whatever the merits, the argument had a face and a phone number. The interim CEO inherits the position without the relationship.
Two dates will show whether the company keeps making that case. Huang was due to appear before three Republican committee chairs for a closed-door briefing on November 18, the day after earnings. Someone from Nvidia still has to sit in that chair, and the answer — counsel, the new chair, or Kress herself — will say how much legal exposure the company thinks it has.
The Justice Department thread is the one that outlives the personnel story. WIRED reports that Commerce's investigation into Megaspeed, the Singapore cloud provider where Alice Huang held a senior role, was halted and transferred to Justice after Nvidia's general counsel inquired about it. A criminal inquiry does not care who the CEO is. It cares what the company knew about a customer buying billions of dollars of its hardware through related entities.
Why the board moved, and why the obvious hire is awkward
WIRED's source says the relationship with a direct report, plus the Megaspeed dealings, probably weighed more in the board's decision than the espionage allegations themselves. That fits the sequence: the board publicly backed Huang on Sunday, then reversed within 72 hours of the second disclosure. A relationship with a subordinate is a documented policy question the board can adjudicate on its own paper. A foreign intelligence assessment is not.
The search has no obvious internal answer, which is why the names circulating are external. The Verge reports that Apple's hardware chief Johny Srouji has been floated at the top of the list. Srouji would be a strange fit in one respect and an obvious one in another: he has shipped silicon at scale for two decades, and he has never had to allocate scarce supply among five frontier labs that all consider themselves the priority customer.
The contrarian case
The bull argument is that demand is booked, CUDA is code rather than a person, and customers will buy the same number of GPUs with or without the founder. It is a serious argument. Nvidia's backlog and its guidance were set before this week, and no purchase order was cancelled on Thursday.
The honest counter is that the part of Huang's job that has no deputy was coordination: deciding who gets allocation in a shortage, pricing the systems business against the cloud renters, keeping TSMC and the memory makers on the same cadence, and making the personal call that unlocked a commitment. None of that appears in an org chart, and all of it now runs through a finance executive on an interim basis and a chair who last ran a software company.
What to watch
Tuesday's call, first. Whether Kress repeats the investment commitments in the same language, whether she takes questions on the portfolio, and whether guidance for the January quarter keeps the no-China assumption. Then November 18, and who Nvidia sends to Congress. Then the search: a permanent CEO named before the fiscal year ends in January would signal the board wants distance from the scandal; a search that drags into spring signals it could not find anyone willing to take a 60-direct-report job with a subpoena attached.
The stock has lost about $600 billion in market value since the board announced its investigation, Reuters reported. The question for the next month is not whether Nvidia can sell GPUs without Huang. It is whether the web of investments, backstops and prepayments that Huang personally assembled can be run by committee — and nobody has tested that yet.
Should an interim CFO be allowed to sign new AI investments before a permanent CEO is named? Write to us via our contact page.
