Jane Street commits $13 billion to Crusoe for GPUs

Share
Jane Street commits $13 billion to Crusoe for GPUs

The trading firm's second enormous compute deal in a month, plus a forecasting model that beats everything and can't be used commercially.


Jane Street signed a five-year cloud contract with Crusoe worth about $13 billion, its second huge GPU commitment in weeks. Bloomberg reported the deal, which gives the trading firm clusters of GPUs and supporting infrastructure for AI training and inference through Crusoe's cloud platform, and Reuters confirmed the report. Crusoe is the highest-profile cloud customer Jane Street has landed, and Bloomberg says the contract helped draw interest to Crusoe's ongoing raise — the company was reported in July to be discussing around $3 billion at roughly a $30 billion valuation. Crusoe and Jane Street did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment.

The pattern is the point. Jane Street led Fluidstack's $1.5 billion round at an $18 billion-plus valuation earlier this month — we covered it in Fluidstack triples to an $18B valuation in six weeks on Jane Street's bet — and now it has committed $13 billion of contracted spend to one of Fluidstack's direct competitors. A market maker buying capacity from multiple neoclouds at once is not picking a winner; it is hedging a compute shortage it expects to persist for the full life of these contracts. And the shape of the commitment says something about what Jane Street thinks it is buying: five years of training and inference capacity is not a research budget, it is an operating assumption that model-driven trading gets more compute-hungry, not less.

For the neoclouds this is the best signal available and the worst one at the same time. Long-dated, credit-worthy demand is exactly what you need to underwrite a data center build, and a marquee name on the contract makes the next fundraise easier. But selling five years of capacity today means having nothing left to sell at next year's prices — and every neocloud that signs a deal like this is betting that GPU scarcity holds long enough to justify locking in the rate.


Google released TimesFM-3, a 330M-parameter time series foundation model that reads many variables at once — under a license that bars commercial use. Most forecasting models look at one series in isolation; TimesFM-3 is natively pre-trained for the multivariate case, so a forecast for ice cream sales can draw on related product lines, foot traffic, and known future events like a scheduled promotion. It alternates two kinds of attention — one causal and backward-looking within a single series, one sideways across all series at a given moment — and it decodes the whole forecast horizon in a single pass instead of patch by patch, which cuts latency and stops errors compounding along the way. Google says it takes the top average rank on Gift-Eval, FEV-Bench and the TIME leaderboard in both point and probabilistic forecasting, with TimesFM-2.5 — state of the art when it launched in September 2025 — now at the bottom of those same tables.

The license is the strategic part. The weights are on Hugging Face under a non-commercial license while the code stays Apache-2.0, and the paid path runs through BigQuery's AI.FORECAST. Google is not hiding the research; it is reserving the product. For anyone doing demand planning, capacity forecasting or observability work, that means the best open forecasting model is available to evaluate and off-limits to deploy — the same squeeze that turned open-weights LLMs into a licensing argument, now arriving in a field that had been genuinely open.


What to watch: whether other neoclouds land Jane Street-scale contracts this quarter, and whether anyone ships a commercially licensed multivariate forecaster that closes the gap.

Is selling five years of GPU capacity forward a sign of confidence in demand, or a sign these companies think prices peak now? Tell us in the comments.

Read more

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Akhetonics says its all-optical CPU reaches a customer in 2026

Light-based computing keeps promising more than it delivers — but one Munich startup has just put a date on its bet, and the interview laying it out is doing the rounds on Hacker News this week. Akhetonics says it will deploy its first commercial machine with a major customer by the end of 2026, with several more planned for 2027. The company, founded by Michael Kissner and Leonardo Del Bino, is building a computer where data enters as light, is switched as light, and circulates through memory

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

The Week in AI — October 5–11, 2026

Every big claim this week turned out to rest on fine print more interesting than the headline: revenue only the company reporting it can define, safety tests sandboxed while the product keeps the web, and a Pentagon phase-out nobody would confirm until reporters kept asking. The week's top 5 1. OpenAI's revenue was $20 billion below the numbers everyone quoted — and the gap was definitional. The Financial Times reported Thursday that OpenAI's annualized revenue runs roughly $20 billion unde

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Drone strike shuts a third Yandex data center, taking YandexGPT offline

Russia's largest tech company is learning what the AI era's infrastructure war looks like from the receiving end — three data centers in four days, and with them much of the cloud layer Russian businesses run on. A Ukrainian drone strike knocked out Yandex's data center in Vladimir early Sunday morning, the third of the company's facilities hit since October 8. The site — reported at roughly 50 MW and designed for about 2,880 server racks — stopped operating completely after the attack, Yandex

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

Agent teams cost up to 5x more, barely score higher

The multi-agent hype train hit a benchmark this weekend — and the grid and the trucking regulators had quiet weeks of their own. Vals AI put agent teams head-to-head with single agents on its Vibe Code Bench, and the teams cost between 1.8 and 5.1 times more for almost no extra quality. The evals company ran GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 solo and in teams across 50 apps at two reasoning efforts; out of four comparisons, only one was statistically significant — Sol at medium effort, where the t