Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the cheaper option on input by 20%; Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper on output by 20%. Figures below are per million tokens, from vendor pricing cited in our reporting.
| Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input per 1M tokens | $0.06 | $0.07 |
| Output per 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.23 |
| Cached input per 1M | $0.01 | $0.01 |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Licence | open weights | |
| Benchmark | — | — |
| Vendor | Inclusionai | Inclusionai |
| Released | — | — |
What the numbers say
- Input price gap: 20% ($0.06 vs $0.07).
- Blended three-to-one input/output rate: $0.36 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL, $0.45 for Ling 3.1 Flash.
- Context: 131K tokens against 1M tokens.
- Licence: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is open weights; Ling 3.1 Flash is .
Sources
Ling 3.0 Flash VL specs · Ling 3.1 Flash specs · Full price index