AT&T swings 40% of its AI calls to open models to cut costs
AT&T is quietly remaking how 100,000 employees use AI, and the lesson for every company staring at a frontier-lab invoice is that open-source models are now the default, not the fallback. VP Mark Austin told reporters the telecom plans to keep its spend on Anthropic and OpenAI's closed models flat over the coming years, and the lever is routing more internal traffic to open and open-weight models like NVIDIA's Nemotron, Meta's Llama, and Google's Gemma.
The numbers are the story. Around 40 percent of employee AI calls now run on open models, a share AT&T aims to push to 60–70 percent over the next few years. Its Ask AT&T system alone processes roughly 45 billion tokens a day — code generation, HR lookup, sales call summaries, customer-support retrieval — an engine that, if fully hosted on closed frontier models, Austin estimates would cost over $100 million a year at published pricing. Austin says the open models he's tested match older Anthropic and OpenAI releases "or do better," and he puts the gap between open weights and the frontier at 6–10 months and shrinking.
Cost routing is doing the heavy lifting. AT&T deploys model-routing that assigns each request to the cheapest model that can do the job — summaries go to open models, hard codegen still gets the top closed models — and after plugging in the LiteLLM routing layer, it cut the cost of advanced coding tasks by up to 56 percent while output quality fell just two percent. The company also runs some open-model workloads on its own data centers with NVIDIA and AMD silicon rather than renting cloud GPUs. It's separately evaluating DeepSeek and Moonshot as they weigh China's open-source models, but hasn't put either into production yet.
This matters well beyond one carrier. It's a public, dollar-signed vote that availability of cheap open models is eroding the pricing power OpenAI and Anthropic bank on right as they slug it out in a very public price war — OpenAI just cut GPT-5.6 Sol API pricing by over 20 percent. We flagged that fight this morning in OpenAI's price war gambit is a warning shot at Anthropic's IPO. AT&T's routing math shows why the pressure is structural, not just competitive: when your biggest customers can swap a modular open model in for a frontier API and lose two percent quality, the closed-model premium has to keep earning its keep.
If you're an AI buying team reading this: have you benchmarked your own token mix against open models yet? Tell us in the comments.
